← Back to Amalga snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Amalga vs Newton, UT

Amalga currently scores 1 points higher overall than Newton, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Amalga

23/100

Open city page →

Newton

22/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Amalga: 23/100 · Newton: 22/100

Amalga is 1 points higher.

Flood

Amalga: 35/100 · Newton: 48/100

Newton is 13 points higher.

Amalga: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Newton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Amalga: 12/100 · Newton: 12/100

No gap.

Amalga: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Newton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Amalga: 11/100 · Newton: 10/100

Amalga is 1 points higher.

Amalga: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Newton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Amalga: 0/100 · Newton: 8/100

Newton is 8 points higher.

Amalga: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Newton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Amalga: 2/100 · Newton: 8/100

Newton is 6 points higher.

Amalga: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Newton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Amalga: Unavailable · Newton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Amalga: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Newton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Amalga: 57/100 · Newton: 47/100

Amalga is 10 points higher.

Amalga: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Newton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Amalga: 21/100 · Newton: 21/100

No gap.

Amalga: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Newton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.