City vs city
Loving vs Weatherford, TX
Weatherford currently scores 4 points higher overall than Loving, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Loving: 44/100 · Weatherford: 48/100
Weatherford is 4 points higher.
Flood
Loving: 28/100 · Weatherford: 27/100
Loving is 1 points higher.
Loving: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Weatherford: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Loving: 15/100 · Weatherford: 14/100
Loving is 1 points higher.
Loving: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Weatherford: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Loving: 59/100 · Weatherford: 52/100
Loving is 7 points higher.
Loving: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Weatherford: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Loving: 15/100 · Weatherford: 46/100
Weatherford is 31 points higher.
Loving: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Weatherford: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Loving: 100/100 · Weatherford: 100/100
No gap.
Loving: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Weatherford: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Loving: Unavailable · Weatherford: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Loving: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Weatherford: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Loving: 81/100 · Weatherford: 66/100
Loving is 15 points higher.
Loving: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Weatherford: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Loving: 9/100 · Weatherford: 28/100
Weatherford is 19 points higher.
Loving: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Weatherford: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.