City vs city
Loving vs McAllen, TX
Loving currently scores 2 points higher overall than McAllen, with the largest gap in lightning.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Loving: 44/100 · McAllen: 42/100
Loving is 2 points higher.
Flood
Loving: 28/100 · McAllen: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Loving: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
McAllen: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Loving: 15/100 · McAllen: 36/100
McAllen is 21 points higher.
Loving: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
McAllen: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Loving: 59/100 · McAllen: 35/100
Loving is 24 points higher.
Loving: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
McAllen: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Loving: 15/100 · McAllen: 27/100
McAllen is 12 points higher.
Loving: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
McAllen: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Loving: 100/100 · McAllen: 100/100
No gap.
Loving: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
McAllen: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Loving: Unavailable · McAllen: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Loving: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
McAllen: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Loving: 81/100 · McAllen: 70/100
Loving is 11 points higher.
Loving: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
McAllen: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Loving: 9/100 · McAllen: 26/100
McAllen is 17 points higher.
Loving: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
McAllen: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.