City vs city
Little Elm vs Sanger, TX
Sanger currently scores 4 points higher overall than Little Elm, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Little Elm: 45/100 · Sanger: 49/100
Sanger is 4 points higher.
Flood
Little Elm: 60/100 · Sanger: 41/100
Little Elm is 19 points higher.
Little Elm: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Sanger: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Little Elm: 14/100 · Sanger: 15/100
Sanger is 1 points higher.
Little Elm: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Sanger: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Little Elm: 61/100 · Sanger: 59/100
Little Elm is 2 points higher.
Little Elm: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Sanger: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Little Elm: 4/100 · Sanger: 42/100
Sanger is 38 points higher.
Little Elm: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sanger: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Little Elm: 100/100 · Sanger: 100/100
No gap.
Little Elm: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sanger: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Little Elm: Unavailable · Sanger: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Little Elm: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Sanger: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Little Elm: 49/100 · Sanger: 58/100
Sanger is 9 points higher.
Little Elm: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Sanger: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Little Elm: 28/100 · Sanger: 28/100
No gap.
Little Elm: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.
Sanger: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.