← Back to Kyle snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Kyle vs Luling, TX

Kyle currently scores 4 points higher overall than Luling, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Luling

34/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Kyle: 38/100 · Luling: 34/100

Kyle is 4 points higher.

Flood

Kyle: 30/100 · Luling: 43/100

Luling is 13 points higher.

Kyle: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Luling: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 13 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Kyle: 17/100 · Luling: 19/100

Luling is 2 points higher.

Kyle: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Luling: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Kyle: 40/100 · Luling: 46/100

Luling is 6 points higher.

Kyle: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Luling: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Kyle: 38/100 · Luling: 15/100

Kyle is 23 points higher.

Kyle: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Luling: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Kyle: 62/100 · Luling: 40/100

Kyle is 22 points higher.

Kyle: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Luling: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Kyle: Unavailable · Luling: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kyle: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Luling: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Kyle: 52/100 · Luling: 52/100

No gap.

Kyle: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Luling: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Kyle: 30/100 · Luling: 26/100

Kyle is 4 points higher.

Kyle: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Luling: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.