City vs city
Edna vs Rosenberg, TX
Edna currently scores 9 points higher overall than Rosenberg, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Edna: 45/100 · Rosenberg: 36/100
Edna is 9 points higher.
Flood
Edna: 42/100 · Rosenberg: 40/100
Edna is 2 points higher.
Edna: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Rosenberg: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Edna: 42/100 · Rosenberg: 41/100
Edna is 1 points higher.
Edna: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Rosenberg: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Edna: 49/100 · Rosenberg: 64/100
Rosenberg is 15 points higher.
Edna: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Rosenberg: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Edna: 58/100 · Rosenberg: 23/100
Edna is 35 points higher.
Edna: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rosenberg: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Edna: 49/100 · Rosenberg: 19/100
Edna is 30 points higher.
Edna: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rosenberg: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Edna: Unavailable · Rosenberg: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Edna: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Rosenberg: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Edna: 49/100 · Rosenberg: 40/100
Edna is 9 points higher.
Edna: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Rosenberg: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Edna: 28/100 · Rosenberg: 28/100
No gap.
Edna: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Rosenberg: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city