City vs city
Cedar Park vs Kingsland, TX
Cedar Park currently scores 8 points higher overall than Kingsland, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cedar Park: 46/100 · Kingsland: 38/100
Cedar Park is 8 points higher.
Flood
Cedar Park: 22/100 · Kingsland: 39/100
Kingsland is 17 points higher.
Cedar Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Kingsland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cedar Park: 16/100 · Kingsland: 14/100
Cedar Park is 2 points higher.
Cedar Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Kingsland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cedar Park: 40/100 · Kingsland: 35/100
Cedar Park is 5 points higher.
Cedar Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Kingsland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cedar Park: 50/100 · Kingsland: 19/100
Cedar Park is 31 points higher.
Cedar Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kingsland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cedar Park: 100/100 · Kingsland: 79/100
Cedar Park is 21 points higher.
Cedar Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kingsland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cedar Park: Unavailable · Kingsland: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cedar Park: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Kingsland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cedar Park: 61/100 · Kingsland: 53/100
Cedar Park is 8 points higher.
Cedar Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Kingsland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cedar Park: 32/100 · Kingsland: 28/100
Cedar Park is 4 points higher.
Cedar Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Kingsland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.