City vs city
Martin vs Memphis, TN
Memphis currently scores 3 points higher overall than Martin, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Martin: 48/100 · Memphis: 51/100
Memphis is 3 points higher.
Flood
Martin: 27/100 · Memphis: 38/100
Memphis is 11 points higher.
Martin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Memphis: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Martin: 14/100 · Memphis: 14/100
No gap.
Martin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Memphis: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Martin: 60/100 · Memphis: 62/100
Memphis is 2 points higher.
Martin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Memphis: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Martin: 88/100 · Memphis: 81/100
Martin is 7 points higher.
Martin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Memphis: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Martin: 63/100 · Memphis: 90/100
Memphis is 27 points higher.
Martin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Memphis: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Martin: Unavailable · Memphis: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Martin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Memphis: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Martin: 59/100 · Memphis: 44/100
Martin is 15 points higher.
Martin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Memphis: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Martin: 25/100 · Memphis: 26/100
Memphis is 1 points higher.
Martin: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Memphis: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.