City vs city
Eva vs Memphis, TN
Memphis currently scores 2 points higher overall than Eva, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Eva: 49/100 · Memphis: 51/100
Memphis is 2 points higher.
Flood
Eva: 54/100 · Memphis: 38/100
Eva is 16 points higher.
Eva: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Memphis: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Eva: 14/100 · Memphis: 14/100
No gap.
Eva: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Memphis: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Eva: 69/100 · Memphis: 62/100
Eva is 7 points higher.
Eva: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Memphis: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Eva: 0/100 · Memphis: 81/100
Memphis is 81 points higher.
Eva: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Memphis: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Eva: 76/100 · Memphis: 90/100
Memphis is 14 points higher.
Eva: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Memphis: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Eva: Unavailable · Memphis: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Eva: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Memphis: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Eva: 55/100 · Memphis: 44/100
Eva is 11 points higher.
Eva: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Memphis: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Eva: 28/100 · Memphis: 26/100
Eva is 2 points higher.
Eva: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Memphis: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city