City vs city
Clinton vs Karns, TN
Clinton currently scores 3 points higher overall than Karns, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 36/100 · Karns: 33/100
Clinton is 3 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: 35/100 · Karns: 38/100
Karns is 3 points higher.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Karns: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clinton: 13/100 · Karns: 13/100
No gap.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Karns: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 42/100 · Karns: 42/100
No gap.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Karns: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 12/100 · Karns: 19/100
Karns is 7 points higher.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Karns: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 64/100 · Karns: 53/100
Clinton is 11 points higher.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Karns: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Karns: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Karns: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clinton: 53/100 · Karns: 34/100
Clinton is 19 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Karns: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clinton: 33/100 · Karns: 33/100
No gap.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Karns: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.