← Back to Camden snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Camden vs Eva, TN

Eva currently scores 8 points higher overall than Camden, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Camden

41/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Camden: 41/100 · Eva: 49/100

Eva is 8 points higher.

Flood

Camden: 30/100 · Eva: 54/100

Eva is 24 points higher.

Camden: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Eva: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Camden: 14/100 · Eva: 14/100

No gap.

Camden: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Eva: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Camden: 69/100 · Eva: 69/100

No gap.

Camden: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Eva: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Camden: 69/100 · Eva: 0/100

Camden is 69 points higher.

Camden: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Eva: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Camden: 29/100 · Eva: 76/100

Eva is 47 points higher.

Camden: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Eva: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Camden: Unavailable · Eva: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Camden: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Eva: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Camden: 50/100 · Eva: 55/100

Eva is 5 points higher.

Camden: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Eva: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Camden: 28/100 · Eva: 28/100

No gap.

Camden: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Eva: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.