City vs city
Ardmore vs Pulaski, TN
Ardmore currently scores 1 points higher overall than Pulaski, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Ardmore: 34/100 · Pulaski: 33/100
Ardmore is 1 points higher.
Flood
Ardmore: 37/100 · Pulaski: 44/100
Pulaski is 7 points higher.
Ardmore: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Pulaski: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Ardmore: 14/100 · Pulaski: 14/100
No gap.
Ardmore: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Pulaski: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Ardmore: 60/100 · Pulaski: 59/100
Ardmore is 1 points higher.
Ardmore: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Pulaski: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Ardmore: 27/100 · Pulaski: 8/100
Ardmore is 19 points higher.
Ardmore: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Pulaski: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Ardmore: 32/100 · Pulaski: 33/100
Pulaski is 1 points higher.
Ardmore: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Pulaski: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Ardmore: Unavailable · Pulaski: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Ardmore: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Pulaski: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Ardmore: 39/100 · Pulaski: 48/100
Pulaski is 9 points higher.
Ardmore: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Pulaski: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Ardmore: 26/100 · Pulaski: 28/100
Pulaski is 2 points higher.
Ardmore: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Pulaski: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.