← Back to Clark snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Clark vs Conde, SD

Clark currently scores 7 points higher overall than Conde, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Clark: 42/100 · Conde: 35/100

Clark is 7 points higher.

Flood

Clark: 49/100 · Conde: 85/100

Conde is 36 points higher.

Clark: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Conde: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 33 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Clark: 20/100 · Conde: 20/100

No gap.

Clark: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Conde: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Clark: 38/100 · Conde: 42/100

Conde is 4 points higher.

Clark: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Conde: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Clark: 35/100 · Conde: 8/100

Clark is 27 points higher.

Clark: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Conde: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Clark: 100/100 · Conde: 43/100

Clark is 57 points higher.

Clark: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Conde: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Clark: Unavailable · Conde: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Clark: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Conde: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Clark: 33/100 · Conde: 40/100

Conde is 7 points higher.

Clark: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Conde: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Clark: 20/100 · Conde: 4/100

Clark is 16 points higher.

Clark: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Conde: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.