City vs city

Central Falls vs Cumberland, RI

Central Falls currently scores 11 points higher overall than Cumberland, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Central Falls

42/100

Open city page →

Cumberland

31/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Central Falls: 42/100 · Cumberland: 31/100

Central Falls is 11 points higher.

Flood

Central Falls: 29/100 · Cumberland: 37/100

Cumberland is 8 points higher.

Central Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Cumberland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Central Falls: 32/100 · Cumberland: 30/100

Central Falls is 2 points higher.

Central Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Cumberland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Central Falls: 10/100 · Cumberland: 10/100

No gap.

Central Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Cumberland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Central Falls: 0/100 · Cumberland: 23/100

Cumberland is 23 points higher.

Central Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Cumberland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Central Falls: 43/100 · Cumberland: 33/100

Central Falls is 10 points higher.

Central Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Cumberland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Central Falls: 94/100 · Cumberland: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Central Falls: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Cumberland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Central Falls: 59/100 · Cumberland: 61/100

Cumberland is 2 points higher.

Central Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Cumberland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Central Falls: 27/100 · Cumberland: 26/100

Central Falls is 1 points higher.

Central Falls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Cumberland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.