City vs city
Reading vs Whitfield, PA
Reading currently scores 7 points higher overall than Whitfield, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Reading: 51/100 · Whitfield: 44/100
Reading is 7 points higher.
Flood
Reading: 78/100 · Whitfield: 80/100
Whitfield is 2 points higher.
Reading: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Whitfield: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Reading: 21/100 · Whitfield: 21/100
No gap.
Reading: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Whitfield: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Reading: 44/100 · Whitfield: 45/100
Whitfield is 1 points higher.
Reading: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Whitfield: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Reading: 31/100 · Whitfield: 0/100
Reading is 31 points higher.
Reading: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Whitfield: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Reading: 98/100 · Whitfield: 30/100
Reading is 68 points higher.
Reading: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Whitfield: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Reading: Unavailable · Whitfield: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Reading: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Whitfield: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Reading: 52/100 · Whitfield: 51/100
Reading is 1 points higher.
Reading: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Whitfield: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Reading: 36/100 · Whitfield: 36/100
No gap.
Reading: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Whitfield: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.