City vs city
Jenners vs Prospect Park, PA
Prospect Park currently scores 14 points higher overall than Jenners, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Jenners: 32/100 · Prospect Park: 46/100
Prospect Park is 14 points higher.
Flood
Jenners: 76/100 · Prospect Park: 63/100
Jenners is 13 points higher.
Jenners: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Prospect Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Jenners: 18/100 · Prospect Park: 22/100
Prospect Park is 4 points higher.
Jenners: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Jenners: 25/100 · Prospect Park: 39/100
Prospect Park is 14 points higher.
Jenners: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Jenners: 4/100 · Prospect Park: 4/100
No gap.
Jenners: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Jenners: 18/100 · Prospect Park: 44/100
Prospect Park is 26 points higher.
Jenners: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Jenners: Unavailable · Prospect Park: 98/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Jenners: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Prospect Park: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Jenners: 43/100 · Prospect Park: 56/100
Prospect Park is 13 points higher.
Jenners: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Prospect Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Jenners: 38/100 · Prospect Park: 41/100
Prospect Park is 3 points higher.
Jenners: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Prospect Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.