City vs city
Glenolden vs Prospect Park, PA
Prospect Park currently scores 6 points higher overall than Glenolden, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Glenolden: 40/100 · Prospect Park: 46/100
Prospect Park is 6 points higher.
Flood
Glenolden: 83/100 · Prospect Park: 63/100
Glenolden is 20 points higher.
Glenolden: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Prospect Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Glenolden: 22/100 · Prospect Park: 22/100
No gap.
Glenolden: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Glenolden: 37/100 · Prospect Park: 39/100
Prospect Park is 2 points higher.
Glenolden: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Glenolden: 8/100 · Prospect Park: 4/100
Glenolden is 4 points higher.
Glenolden: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Glenolden: 43/100 · Prospect Park: 44/100
Prospect Park is 1 points higher.
Glenolden: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Glenolden: 67/100 · Prospect Park: 98/100
Prospect Park is 31 points higher.
Glenolden: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Prospect Park: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Glenolden: 15/100 · Prospect Park: 56/100
Prospect Park is 41 points higher.
Glenolden: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Prospect Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Glenolden: 44/100 · Prospect Park: 41/100
Glenolden is 3 points higher.
Glenolden: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Prospect Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.