← Back to Folcroft snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Folcroft vs Prospect Park, PA

Folcroft currently scores 1 points higher overall than Prospect Park, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Folcroft

47/100

Open city page →

Prospect Park

46/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Folcroft: 47/100 · Prospect Park: 46/100

Folcroft is 1 points higher.

Flood

Folcroft: 79/100 · Prospect Park: 63/100

Folcroft is 16 points higher.

Folcroft: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 19 features intersect this tile.

Prospect Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Folcroft: 22/100 · Prospect Park: 22/100

No gap.

Folcroft: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Prospect Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Folcroft: 37/100 · Prospect Park: 39/100

Prospect Park is 2 points higher.

Folcroft: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Prospect Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Folcroft: 0/100 · Prospect Park: 4/100

Prospect Park is 4 points higher.

Folcroft: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Prospect Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Folcroft: 34/100 · Prospect Park: 44/100

Prospect Park is 10 points higher.

Folcroft: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Prospect Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Folcroft: 98/100 · Prospect Park: 98/100

No gap.

Folcroft: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Prospect Park: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Folcroft: 17/100 · Prospect Park: 56/100

Prospect Park is 39 points higher.

Folcroft: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Prospect Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Folcroft: 41/100 · Prospect Park: 41/100

No gap.

Folcroft: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Prospect Park: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.