City vs city
Cheyney vs Prospect Park, PA
Prospect Park currently scores 10 points higher overall than Cheyney, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cheyney: 36/100 · Prospect Park: 46/100
Prospect Park is 10 points higher.
Flood
Cheyney: 64/100 · Prospect Park: 63/100
Cheyney is 1 points higher.
Cheyney: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Prospect Park: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cheyney: 22/100 · Prospect Park: 22/100
No gap.
Cheyney: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cheyney: 42/100 · Prospect Park: 39/100
Cheyney is 3 points higher.
Cheyney: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Prospect Park: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cheyney: 19/100 · Prospect Park: 4/100
Cheyney is 15 points higher.
Cheyney: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cheyney: 23/100 · Prospect Park: 44/100
Prospect Park is 21 points higher.
Cheyney: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Prospect Park: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cheyney: Unavailable · Prospect Park: 98/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cheyney: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Prospect Park: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Cheyney: 43/100 · Prospect Park: 56/100
Prospect Park is 13 points higher.
Cheyney: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Prospect Park: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cheyney: 41/100 · Prospect Park: 41/100
No gap.
Cheyney: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Prospect Park: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.