← Back to Heppner snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Heppner vs Stanfield, OR

Heppner currently scores 1 points higher overall than Stanfield, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Heppner

18/100

Open city page →

Stanfield

17/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Heppner: 18/100 · Stanfield: 17/100

Heppner is 1 points higher.

Flood

Heppner: 28/100 · Stanfield: 44/100

Stanfield is 16 points higher.

Heppner: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Stanfield: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Heppner: 9/100 · Stanfield: 9/100

No gap.

Heppner: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Stanfield: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Heppner: 4/100 · Stanfield: 4/100

No gap.

Heppner: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Stanfield: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Heppner: 0/100 · Stanfield: 4/100

Stanfield is 4 points higher.

Heppner: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Stanfield: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Heppner: 6/100 · Stanfield: 7/100

Stanfield is 1 points higher.

Heppner: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Stanfield: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Heppner: Unavailable · Stanfield: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Heppner: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Stanfield: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Heppner: 47/100 · Stanfield: 38/100

Heppner is 9 points higher.

Heppner: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Stanfield: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Heppner: 12/100 · Stanfield: 12/100

No gap.

Heppner: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Stanfield: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.