← Back to Boring snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Boring vs Gresham, OR

Boring currently scores 8 points higher overall than Gresham, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Boring

15/100

Open city page →

Gresham

7/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Boring: 15/100 · Gresham: 7/100

Boring is 8 points higher.

Flood

Boring: 27/100 · Gresham: 10/100

Boring is 17 points higher.

Boring: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Gresham: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Boring: 6/100 · Gresham: 6/100

No gap.

Boring: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Gresham: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Boring: 1/100 · Gresham: 1/100

No gap.

Boring: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Gresham: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Boring: 0/100 · Gresham: 4/100

Gresham is 4 points higher.

Boring: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Gresham: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Boring: 1/100 · Gresham: 3/100

Gresham is 2 points higher.

Boring: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Gresham: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Boring: Unavailable · Gresham: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Boring: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Gresham: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Boring: 44/100 · Gresham: 15/100

Boring is 29 points higher.

Boring: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Gresham: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Boring: 9/100 · Gresham: 11/100

Gresham is 2 points higher.

Boring: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Gresham: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.