← Back to Tulsa snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Tulsa vs Watts, OK

Watts currently scores 4 points higher overall than Tulsa, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Tulsa: 51/100 · Watts: 55/100

Watts is 4 points higher.

Flood

Tulsa: 45/100 · Watts: 22/100

Tulsa is 23 points higher.

Tulsa: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Watts: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Tulsa: 17/100 · Watts: 16/100

Tulsa is 1 points higher.

Tulsa: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Watts: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Tulsa: 58/100 · Watts: 70/100

Watts is 12 points higher.

Tulsa: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Watts: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Tulsa: 69/100 · Watts: 96/100

Watts is 27 points higher.

Tulsa: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Watts: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Tulsa: 100/100 · Watts: 100/100

No gap.

Tulsa: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Watts: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Tulsa: Unavailable · Watts: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Tulsa: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Watts: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Tulsa: 41/100 · Watts: 52/100

Watts is 11 points higher.

Tulsa: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Watts: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Tulsa: 28/100 · Watts: 30/100

Watts is 2 points higher.

Tulsa: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Watts: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.