← Back to Stigler snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Stigler vs Tulsa, OK

Stigler currently scores 1 points higher overall than Tulsa, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Stigler

52/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Stigler: 52/100 · Tulsa: 51/100

Stigler is 1 points higher.

Flood

Stigler: 53/100 · Tulsa: 45/100

Stigler is 8 points higher.

Stigler: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.

Tulsa: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Stigler: 15/100 · Tulsa: 17/100

Tulsa is 2 points higher.

Stigler: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Tulsa: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Stigler: 72/100 · Tulsa: 58/100

Stigler is 14 points higher.

Stigler: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tulsa: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Stigler: 35/100 · Tulsa: 69/100

Tulsa is 34 points higher.

Stigler: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tulsa: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Stigler: 100/100 · Tulsa: 100/100

No gap.

Stigler: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tulsa: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Stigler: Unavailable · Tulsa: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Stigler: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Tulsa: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Stigler: 62/100 · Tulsa: 41/100

Stigler is 21 points higher.

Stigler: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Tulsa: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Stigler: 28/100 · Tulsa: 28/100

No gap.

Stigler: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Tulsa: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.