City vs city
Gans vs Muldrow, OK
Gans currently scores 1 points higher overall than Muldrow, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Gans: 53/100 · Muldrow: 52/100
Gans is 1 points higher.
Flood
Gans: 83/100 · Muldrow: 42/100
Gans is 41 points higher.
Gans: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Muldrow: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Gans: 15/100 · Muldrow: 15/100
No gap.
Gans: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Muldrow: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Gans: 81/100 · Muldrow: 81/100
No gap.
Gans: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Muldrow: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Gans: 58/100 · Muldrow: 31/100
Gans is 27 points higher.
Gans: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Muldrow: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Gans: 43/100 · Muldrow: 100/100
Muldrow is 57 points higher.
Gans: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Muldrow: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Gans: Unavailable · Muldrow: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Gans: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Muldrow: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Gans: 65/100 · Muldrow: 69/100
Muldrow is 4 points higher.
Gans: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Muldrow: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Gans: 27/100 · Muldrow: 27/100
No gap.
Gans: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Muldrow: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city