City vs city

Burns Flat vs Clinton, OK

Clinton currently scores 12 points higher overall than Burns Flat, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Burns Flat

43/100

Open city page →

Clinton

55/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Burns Flat: 43/100 · Clinton: 55/100

Clinton is 12 points higher.

Flood

Burns Flat: 47/100 · Clinton: 59/100

Clinton is 12 points higher.

Burns Flat: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Burns Flat: 18/100 · Clinton: 18/100

No gap.

Burns Flat: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Burns Flat: 67/100 · Clinton: 76/100

Clinton is 9 points higher.

Burns Flat: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Burns Flat: 8/100 · Clinton: 69/100

Clinton is 61 points higher.

Burns Flat: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Burns Flat: 100/100 · Clinton: 100/100

No gap.

Burns Flat: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Burns Flat: Unavailable · Clinton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Burns Flat: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Burns Flat: 34/100 · Clinton: 39/100

Clinton is 5 points higher.

Burns Flat: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Burns Flat: 26/100 · Clinton: 26/100

No gap.

Burns Flat: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.