City vs city
Billings vs Tonkawa, OK
Tonkawa currently scores 7 points higher overall than Billings, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Billings: 48/100 · Tonkawa: 55/100
Tonkawa is 7 points higher.
Flood
Billings: 50/100 · Tonkawa: 100/100
Tonkawa is 50 points higher.
Billings: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Tonkawa: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Billings: 18/100 · Tonkawa: 18/100
No gap.
Billings: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tonkawa: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Billings: 74/100 · Tonkawa: 73/100
Billings is 1 points higher.
Billings: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tonkawa: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Billings: 46/100 · Tonkawa: 27/100
Billings is 19 points higher.
Billings: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tonkawa: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Billings: 100/100 · Tonkawa: 100/100
No gap.
Billings: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tonkawa: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Billings: Unavailable · Tonkawa: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Billings: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tonkawa: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Billings: 24/100 · Tonkawa: 37/100
Tonkawa is 13 points higher.
Billings: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tonkawa: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Billings: 27/100 · Tonkawa: 27/100
No gap.
Billings: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tonkawa: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.