← Back to Baker snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Baker vs Hooker, OK

Hooker currently scores 8 points higher overall than Baker, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hooker

46/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Baker: 38/100 · Hooker: 46/100

Hooker is 8 points higher.

Flood

Baker: 39/100 · Hooker: 39/100

No gap.

Baker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Hooker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Baker: 18/100 · Hooker: 18/100

No gap.

Baker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Hooker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Baker: 58/100 · Hooker: 57/100

Baker is 1 points higher.

Baker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Hooker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Baker: 35/100 · Hooker: 27/100

Baker is 8 points higher.

Baker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hooker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Baker: 37/100 · Hooker: 100/100

Hooker is 63 points higher.

Baker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hooker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Baker: Unavailable · Hooker: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Baker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Hooker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Baker: 42/100 · Hooker: 32/100

Baker is 10 points higher.

Baker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Hooker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Baker: Unavailable · Hooker: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Baker: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.

Hooker: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.