City vs city
Baker vs Beaver, OK
Beaver currently scores 5 points higher overall than Baker, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Baker: 38/100 · Beaver: 43/100
Beaver is 5 points higher.
Flood
Baker: 39/100 · Beaver: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Beaver: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Baker: 18/100 · Beaver: 18/100
No gap.
Baker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Beaver: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Baker: 58/100 · Beaver: 54/100
Baker is 4 points higher.
Baker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Beaver: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Baker: 35/100 · Beaver: 42/100
Beaver is 7 points higher.
Baker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Beaver: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Baker: 37/100 · Beaver: 100/100
Beaver is 63 points higher.
Baker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Beaver: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Baker: Unavailable · Beaver: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Beaver: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Baker: 42/100 · Beaver: 62/100
Beaver is 20 points higher.
Baker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Beaver: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Baker: Unavailable · Beaver: 23/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Beaver: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.