City vs city
Addington vs Walters, OK
Addington currently scores 9 points higher overall than Walters, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Addington: 46/100 · Walters: 37/100
Addington is 9 points higher.
Flood
Addington: 9/100 · Walters: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Addington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Walters: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Addington: 16/100 · Walters: 16/100
No gap.
Addington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Walters: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Addington: 58/100 · Walters: 54/100
Addington is 4 points higher.
Addington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Walters: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Addington: 58/100 · Walters: 19/100
Addington is 39 points higher.
Addington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Walters: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Addington: 100/100 · Walters: 100/100
No gap.
Addington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Walters: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Addington: Unavailable · Walters: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Addington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Walters: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Addington: 52/100 · Walters: 47/100
Addington is 5 points higher.
Addington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Walters: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Addington: 27/100 · Walters: 26/100
Addington is 1 points higher.
Addington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Walters: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.