City vs city
Adams vs Beaver, OK
Beaver currently scores 5 points higher overall than Adams, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Adams: 38/100 · Beaver: 43/100
Beaver is 5 points higher.
Flood
Adams: 39/100 · Beaver: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Adams: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Beaver: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Adams: 18/100 · Beaver: 18/100
No gap.
Adams: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Beaver: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Adams: 58/100 · Beaver: 54/100
Adams is 4 points higher.
Adams: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Beaver: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Adams: 12/100 · Beaver: 42/100
Beaver is 30 points higher.
Adams: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Beaver: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Adams: 51/100 · Beaver: 100/100
Beaver is 49 points higher.
Adams: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Beaver: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Adams: Unavailable · Beaver: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Adams: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Beaver: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Adams: 52/100 · Beaver: 62/100
Beaver is 10 points higher.
Adams: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Beaver: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Adams: Unavailable · Beaver: 23/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Adams: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Beaver: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.