City vs city
Norwood vs Reading, OH
Reading currently scores 1 points higher overall than Norwood, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Norwood: 39/100 · Reading: 40/100
Reading is 1 points higher.
Flood
Norwood: 64/100 · Reading: 69/100
Reading is 5 points higher.
Norwood: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Reading: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Norwood: 15/100 · Reading: 15/100
No gap.
Norwood: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Reading: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Norwood: 49/100 · Reading: 50/100
Reading is 1 points higher.
Norwood: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Reading: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Norwood: 42/100 · Reading: 15/100
Norwood is 27 points higher.
Norwood: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Reading: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Norwood: 60/100 · Reading: 85/100
Reading is 25 points higher.
Norwood: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Reading: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Norwood: Unavailable · Reading: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Norwood: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Reading: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Norwood: 7/100 · Reading: 6/100
Norwood is 1 points higher.
Norwood: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Reading: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Norwood: 37/100 · Reading: 37/100
No gap.
Norwood: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Reading: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.