City vs city
Corning vs Lancaster, OH
Corning currently scores 4 points higher overall than Lancaster, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Corning: 33/100 · Lancaster: 29/100
Corning is 4 points higher.
Flood
Corning: 52/100 · Lancaster: 64/100
Lancaster is 12 points higher.
Corning: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Lancaster: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Corning: 16/100 · Lancaster: 16/100
No gap.
Corning: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lancaster: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Corning: 23/100 · Lancaster: 21/100
Corning is 2 points higher.
Corning: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Lancaster: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Corning: 0/100 · Lancaster: 8/100
Lancaster is 8 points higher.
Corning: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lancaster: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Corning: 15/100 · Lancaster: 32/100
Lancaster is 17 points higher.
Corning: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lancaster: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Corning: Unavailable · Lancaster: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Corning: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Lancaster: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Corning: 47/100 · Lancaster: 27/100
Corning is 20 points higher.
Corning: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Lancaster: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Corning: 42/100 · Lancaster: 35/100
Corning is 7 points higher.
Corning: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Lancaster: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.