City vs city
Kings Point vs Port Washington, NY
Port Washington currently scores 3 points higher overall than Kings Point, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Kings Point: 39/100 · Port Washington: 42/100
Port Washington is 3 points higher.
Flood
Kings Point: 48/100 · Port Washington: 36/100
Kings Point is 12 points higher.
Kings Point: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 16 features intersect this tile.
Port Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Kings Point: 25/100 · Port Washington: 26/100
Port Washington is 1 points higher.
Kings Point: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Kings Point: 19/100 · Port Washington: 18/100
Kings Point is 1 points higher.
Kings Point: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Kings Point: 0/100 · Port Washington: 8/100
Port Washington is 8 points higher.
Kings Point: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Kings Point: 17/100 · Port Washington: 31/100
Port Washington is 14 points higher.
Kings Point: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Kings Point: 99/100 · Port Washington: 99/100
No gap.
Kings Point: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Port Washington: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Kings Point: 23/100 · Port Washington: 77/100
Port Washington is 54 points higher.
Kings Point: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Port Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Kings Point: 43/100 · Port Washington: 40/100
Kings Point is 3 points higher.
Kings Point: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Port Washington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.