City vs city
Flower Hill vs Port Washington, NY
Flower Hill and Port Washington are tied on overall score, with the biggest factor difference in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Flower Hill: 42/100 · Port Washington: 42/100
No gap.
Flood
Flower Hill: 36/100 · Port Washington: 36/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Port Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Flower Hill: 26/100 · Port Washington: 26/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Flower Hill: 18/100 · Port Washington: 18/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Flower Hill: 8/100 · Port Washington: 8/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Flower Hill: 31/100 · Port Washington: 31/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Flower Hill: 99/100 · Port Washington: 99/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Port Washington: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Flower Hill: 77/100 · Port Washington: 77/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Port Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Flower Hill: 40/100 · Port Washington: 40/100
No gap.
Flower Hill: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Port Washington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.