City vs city
East Hills vs Port Washington, NY
East Hills currently scores 13 points higher overall than Port Washington, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
East Hills: 55/100 · Port Washington: 42/100
East Hills is 13 points higher.
Flood
East Hills: 26/100 · Port Washington: 36/100
Port Washington is 10 points higher.
East Hills: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Port Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
East Hills: 27/100 · Port Washington: 26/100
East Hills is 1 points higher.
East Hills: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
East Hills: 17/100 · Port Washington: 18/100
Port Washington is 1 points higher.
East Hills: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Port Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
East Hills: 0/100 · Port Washington: 8/100
Port Washington is 8 points higher.
East Hills: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
East Hills: 85/100 · Port Washington: 31/100
East Hills is 54 points higher.
East Hills: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Port Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
East Hills: 99/100 · Port Washington: 99/100
No gap.
East Hills: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Port Washington: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
East Hills: 84/100 · Port Washington: 77/100
East Hills is 7 points higher.
East Hills: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Port Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
East Hills: 47/100 · Port Washington: 40/100
East Hills is 7 points higher.
East Hills: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Port Washington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.