City vs city
Congers vs Ossining, NY
Congers currently scores 9 points higher overall than Ossining, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Congers: 47/100 · Ossining: 38/100
Congers is 9 points higher.
Flood
Congers: 56/100 · Ossining: 50/100
Congers is 6 points higher.
Congers: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Ossining: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Congers: 22/100 · Ossining: 22/100
No gap.
Congers: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Ossining: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Congers: 23/100 · Ossining: 22/100
Congers is 1 points higher.
Congers: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Ossining: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Congers: 0/100 · Ossining: 4/100
Ossining is 4 points higher.
Congers: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ossining: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Congers: 37/100 · Ossining: 12/100
Congers is 25 points higher.
Congers: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Ossining: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Congers: 83/100 · Ossining: 94/100
Ossining is 11 points higher.
Congers: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Ossining: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Congers: 79/100 · Ossining: 71/100
Congers is 8 points higher.
Congers: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ossining: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Congers: 30/100 · Ossining: 28/100
Congers is 2 points higher.
Congers: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Ossining: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.