← Back to Chappaqua snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Chappaqua vs City of Binghamton, NY

Chappaqua currently scores 2 points higher overall than City of Binghamton, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Chappaqua

34/100

Open city page →

City of Binghamton

32/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Chappaqua: 34/100 · City of Binghamton: 32/100

Chappaqua is 2 points higher.

Flood

Chappaqua: 34/100 · City of Binghamton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chappaqua: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

City of Binghamton: Flood model is not available for this location yet.

Wind

Chappaqua: 23/100 · City of Binghamton: 19/100

Chappaqua is 4 points higher.

Chappaqua: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

City of Binghamton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Chappaqua: 21/100 · City of Binghamton: 17/100

Chappaqua is 4 points higher.

Chappaqua: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

City of Binghamton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Chappaqua: 0/100 · City of Binghamton: 0/100

No gap.

Chappaqua: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

City of Binghamton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Chappaqua: 20/100 · City of Binghamton: 60/100

City of Binghamton is 40 points higher.

Chappaqua: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

City of Binghamton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Chappaqua: Unavailable · City of Binghamton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chappaqua: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

City of Binghamton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Chappaqua: 78/100 · City of Binghamton: 62/100

Chappaqua is 16 points higher.

Chappaqua: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

City of Binghamton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Chappaqua: 27/100 · City of Binghamton: 34/100

City of Binghamton is 7 points higher.

Chappaqua: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

City of Binghamton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.