City vs city

Briarcliff vs Hoosick Falls, NY

Briarcliff currently scores 13 points higher overall than Hoosick Falls, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Briarcliff

38/100

Open city page →

Hoosick Falls

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Briarcliff: 38/100 · Hoosick Falls: 25/100

Briarcliff is 13 points higher.

Flood

Briarcliff: 50/100 · Hoosick Falls: 17/100

Briarcliff is 33 points higher.

Briarcliff: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Hoosick Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Briarcliff: 22/100 · Hoosick Falls: 18/100

Briarcliff is 4 points higher.

Briarcliff: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Hoosick Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Briarcliff: 22/100 · Hoosick Falls: 26/100

Hoosick Falls is 4 points higher.

Briarcliff: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Hoosick Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Briarcliff: 4/100 · Hoosick Falls: 8/100

Hoosick Falls is 4 points higher.

Briarcliff: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hoosick Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Briarcliff: 12/100 · Hoosick Falls: 19/100

Hoosick Falls is 7 points higher.

Briarcliff: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hoosick Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Briarcliff: 94/100 · Hoosick Falls: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Briarcliff: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Hoosick Falls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Briarcliff: 71/100 · Hoosick Falls: 63/100

Briarcliff is 8 points higher.

Briarcliff: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Hoosick Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Briarcliff: 28/100 · Hoosick Falls: 25/100

Briarcliff is 3 points higher.

Briarcliff: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Hoosick Falls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.