← Back to Jal snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Jal vs Loving, NM

Jal currently scores 2 points higher overall than Loving, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Loving

40/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Jal: 42/100 · Loving: 40/100

Jal is 2 points higher.

Flood

Jal: 61/100 · Loving: 79/100

Loving is 18 points higher.

Jal: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Loving: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Jal: 14/100 · Loving: 14/100

No gap.

Jal: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Loving: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Jal: 27/100 · Loving: 27/100

No gap.

Jal: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Loving: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Jal: 15/100 · Loving: 8/100

Jal is 7 points higher.

Jal: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Loving: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Jal: 100/100 · Loving: 81/100

Jal is 19 points higher.

Jal: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Loving: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Jal: Unavailable · Loving: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Jal: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Loving: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Jal: 52/100 · Loving: 51/100

Jal is 1 points higher.

Jal: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Loving: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Jal: 26/100 · Loving: 19/100

Jal is 7 points higher.

Jal: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Loving: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.