← Back to Hobbs snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Hobbs vs Newkirk, NM

Hobbs currently scores 26 points higher overall than Newkirk, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Newkirk

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Hobbs: 51/100 · Newkirk: 25/100

Hobbs is 26 points higher.

Flood

Hobbs: 64/100 · Newkirk: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Hobbs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.

Newkirk: Flood model is not available for this location yet.

Wind

Hobbs: 14/100 · Newkirk: 14/100

No gap.

Hobbs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Newkirk: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Hobbs: 34/100 · Newkirk: 48/100

Newkirk is 14 points higher.

Hobbs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Newkirk: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Hobbs: 62/100 · Newkirk: 4/100

Hobbs is 58 points higher.

Hobbs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Newkirk: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Hobbs: 100/100 · Newkirk: 37/100

Hobbs is 63 points higher.

Hobbs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Newkirk: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Hobbs: Unavailable · Newkirk: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Hobbs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Newkirk: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Hobbs: 59/100 · Newkirk: 46/100

Hobbs is 13 points higher.

Hobbs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Newkirk: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Hobbs: 26/100 · Newkirk: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Hobbs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Newkirk: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.