City vs city
Hobbs vs Lovington, NM
Lovington currently scores 1 points higher overall than Hobbs, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hobbs: 51/100 · Lovington: 52/100
Lovington is 1 points higher.
Flood
Hobbs: 64/100 · Lovington: 53/100
Hobbs is 11 points higher.
Hobbs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Lovington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hobbs: 14/100 · Lovington: 14/100
No gap.
Hobbs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lovington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hobbs: 34/100 · Lovington: 36/100
Lovington is 2 points higher.
Hobbs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Lovington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hobbs: 62/100 · Lovington: 77/100
Lovington is 15 points higher.
Hobbs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lovington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hobbs: 100/100 · Lovington: 100/100
No gap.
Hobbs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Lovington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hobbs: Unavailable · Lovington: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hobbs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Lovington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hobbs: 59/100 · Lovington: 57/100
Hobbs is 2 points higher.
Hobbs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Lovington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hobbs: 26/100 · Lovington: 26/100
No gap.
Hobbs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Lovington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.