City vs city
High Rolls vs Twin Forks, NM
Twin Forks currently scores 6 points higher overall than High Rolls, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
High Rolls: 31/100 · Twin Forks: 37/100
Twin Forks is 6 points higher.
Flood
High Rolls: 53/100 · Twin Forks: 57/100
Twin Forks is 4 points higher.
High Rolls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Twin Forks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
High Rolls: 14/100 · Twin Forks: 14/100
No gap.
High Rolls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Twin Forks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
High Rolls: 24/100 · Twin Forks: 26/100
Twin Forks is 2 points higher.
High Rolls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Twin Forks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
High Rolls: 0/100 · Twin Forks: 0/100
No gap.
High Rolls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Forks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
High Rolls: 13/100 · Twin Forks: 11/100
High Rolls is 2 points higher.
High Rolls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Forks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
High Rolls: Unavailable · Twin Forks: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
High Rolls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Twin Forks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
High Rolls: 68/100 · Twin Forks: 97/100
Twin Forks is 29 points higher.
High Rolls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Twin Forks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
High Rolls: 14/100 · Twin Forks: 14/100
No gap.
High Rolls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Twin Forks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.