City vs city
Hagerman vs Hobbs, NM
Hobbs currently scores 7 points higher overall than Hagerman, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hagerman: 44/100 · Hobbs: 51/100
Hobbs is 7 points higher.
Flood
Hagerman: 100/100 · Hobbs: 64/100
Hagerman is 36 points higher.
Hagerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Hobbs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hagerman: 14/100 · Hobbs: 14/100
No gap.
Hagerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hobbs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hagerman: 30/100 · Hobbs: 34/100
Hobbs is 4 points higher.
Hagerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hobbs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hagerman: 15/100 · Hobbs: 62/100
Hobbs is 47 points higher.
Hagerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hobbs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hagerman: 83/100 · Hobbs: 100/100
Hobbs is 17 points higher.
Hagerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hobbs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hagerman: Unavailable · Hobbs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hagerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hobbs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hagerman: 51/100 · Hobbs: 59/100
Hobbs is 8 points higher.
Hagerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hobbs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hagerman: 18/100 · Hobbs: 26/100
Hobbs is 8 points higher.
Hagerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hobbs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.