City vs city
Cloudcroft vs Twin Forks, NM
Twin Forks currently scores 5 points higher overall than Cloudcroft, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cloudcroft: 32/100 · Twin Forks: 37/100
Twin Forks is 5 points higher.
Flood
Cloudcroft: 53/100 · Twin Forks: 57/100
Twin Forks is 4 points higher.
Cloudcroft: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Twin Forks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cloudcroft: 14/100 · Twin Forks: 14/100
No gap.
Cloudcroft: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Twin Forks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cloudcroft: 25/100 · Twin Forks: 26/100
Twin Forks is 1 points higher.
Cloudcroft: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Twin Forks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cloudcroft: 4/100 · Twin Forks: 0/100
Cloudcroft is 4 points higher.
Cloudcroft: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Forks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cloudcroft: 31/100 · Twin Forks: 11/100
Cloudcroft is 20 points higher.
Cloudcroft: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Forks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cloudcroft: Unavailable · Twin Forks: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cloudcroft: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Twin Forks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cloudcroft: 81/100 · Twin Forks: 97/100
Twin Forks is 16 points higher.
Cloudcroft: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Twin Forks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cloudcroft: 14/100 · Twin Forks: 14/100
No gap.
Cloudcroft: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Twin Forks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.