City vs city
Clayton vs Tucumcari, NM
Tucumcari currently scores 1 points higher overall than Clayton, with the largest gap in lightning.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clayton: 35/100 · Tucumcari: 36/100
Tucumcari is 1 points higher.
Flood
Clayton: Unavailable · Tucumcari: 0/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clayton: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Tucumcari: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clayton: 16/100 · Tucumcari: 15/100
Clayton is 1 points higher.
Clayton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tucumcari: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clayton: 48/100 · Tucumcari: 52/100
Tucumcari is 4 points higher.
Clayton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tucumcari: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clayton: 12/100 · Tucumcari: 12/100
No gap.
Clayton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tucumcari: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clayton: 100/100 · Tucumcari: 100/100
No gap.
Clayton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tucumcari: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clayton: Unavailable · Tucumcari: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clayton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tucumcari: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Clayton: 33/100 · Tucumcari: 37/100
Tucumcari is 4 points higher.
Clayton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tucumcari: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Clayton: Unavailable · Tucumcari: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clayton: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Tucumcari: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.