City vs city
Atoka vs Hobbs, NM
Hobbs currently scores 6 points higher overall than Atoka, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Atoka: 45/100 · Hobbs: 51/100
Hobbs is 6 points higher.
Flood
Atoka: 100/100 · Hobbs: 64/100
Atoka is 36 points higher.
Atoka: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Hobbs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Atoka: 14/100 · Hobbs: 14/100
No gap.
Atoka: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hobbs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Atoka: 28/100 · Hobbs: 34/100
Hobbs is 6 points higher.
Atoka: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hobbs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Atoka: 15/100 · Hobbs: 62/100
Hobbs is 47 points higher.
Atoka: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hobbs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Atoka: 100/100 · Hobbs: 100/100
No gap.
Atoka: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hobbs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Atoka: Unavailable · Hobbs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Atoka: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hobbs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Atoka: 39/100 · Hobbs: 59/100
Hobbs is 20 points higher.
Atoka: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hobbs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Atoka: 19/100 · Hobbs: 26/100
Hobbs is 7 points higher.
Atoka: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hobbs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.