City vs city

Smithville vs Tuckerton, NJ

Smithville currently scores 6 points higher overall than Tuckerton, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Smithville

47/100

Open city page →

Tuckerton

41/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Smithville: 47/100 · Tuckerton: 41/100

Smithville is 6 points higher.

Flood

Smithville: 68/100 · Tuckerton: 66/100

Smithville is 2 points higher.

Smithville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.

Tuckerton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Smithville: 31/100 · Tuckerton: 32/100

Tuckerton is 1 points higher.

Smithville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Tuckerton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Smithville: 17/100 · Tuckerton: 17/100

No gap.

Smithville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tuckerton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Smithville: 0/100 · Tuckerton: 4/100

Tuckerton is 4 points higher.

Smithville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tuckerton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Smithville: 20/100 · Tuckerton: 3/100

Smithville is 17 points higher.

Smithville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Tuckerton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Smithville: 98/100 · Tuckerton: 98/100

No gap.

Smithville: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Tuckerton: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Smithville: 62/100 · Tuckerton: 73/100

Tuckerton is 11 points higher.

Smithville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Tuckerton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Smithville: 32/100 · Tuckerton: 32/100

No gap.

Smithville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Tuckerton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.