City vs city

Port Reading vs Rahway, NJ

Rahway currently scores 2 points higher overall than Port Reading, with the largest gap in wildfire.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Port Reading

35/100

Open city page →

Rahway

37/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Port Reading: 35/100 · Rahway: 37/100

Rahway is 2 points higher.

Flood

Port Reading: 13/100 · Rahway: 0/100

Port Reading is 13 points higher.

Port Reading: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Rahway: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Port Reading: 23/100 · Rahway: 22/100

Port Reading is 1 points higher.

Port Reading: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Rahway: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Port Reading: 19/100 · Rahway: 19/100

No gap.

Port Reading: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Rahway: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Port Reading: 0/100 · Rahway: 19/100

Rahway is 19 points higher.

Port Reading: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rahway: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Port Reading: 41/100 · Rahway: 28/100

Port Reading is 13 points higher.

Port Reading: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rahway: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Port Reading: 98/100 · Rahway: 97/100

Port Reading is 1 points higher.

Port Reading: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Rahway: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Port Reading: 19/100 · Rahway: 73/100

Rahway is 54 points higher.

Port Reading: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Rahway: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Port Reading: 35/100 · Rahway: 37/100

Rahway is 2 points higher.

Port Reading: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Rahway: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.