City vs city

Gloucester City vs Mount Ephraim, NJ

Gloucester City currently scores 8 points higher overall than Mount Ephraim, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Gloucester City

41/100

Open city page →

Mount Ephraim

33/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Gloucester City: 41/100 · Mount Ephraim: 33/100

Gloucester City is 8 points higher.

Flood

Gloucester City: 31/100 · Mount Ephraim: 0/100

Gloucester City is 31 points higher.

Gloucester City: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Mount Ephraim: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Gloucester City: 22/100 · Mount Ephraim: 22/100

No gap.

Gloucester City: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Mount Ephraim: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Gloucester City: 35/100 · Mount Ephraim: 32/100

Gloucester City is 3 points higher.

Gloucester City: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Mount Ephraim: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Gloucester City: 12/100 · Mount Ephraim: 19/100

Mount Ephraim is 7 points higher.

Gloucester City: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Mount Ephraim: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Gloucester City: 38/100 · Mount Ephraim: 58/100

Mount Ephraim is 20 points higher.

Gloucester City: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Mount Ephraim: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Gloucester City: 98/100 · Mount Ephraim: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Gloucester City: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Mount Ephraim: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Gloucester City: 55/100 · Mount Ephraim: 62/100

Mount Ephraim is 7 points higher.

Gloucester City: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Mount Ephraim: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Gloucester City: 40/100 · Mount Ephraim: 39/100

Gloucester City is 1 points higher.

Gloucester City: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Mount Ephraim: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.