City vs city
Crosswicks vs White Horse, NJ
White Horse currently scores 2 points higher overall than Crosswicks, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Crosswicks: 36/100 · White Horse: 38/100
White Horse is 2 points higher.
Flood
Crosswicks: 18/100 · White Horse: 72/100
White Horse is 54 points higher.
Crosswicks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
White Horse: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Crosswicks: 23/100 · White Horse: 22/100
Crosswicks is 1 points higher.
Crosswicks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
White Horse: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Crosswicks: 23/100 · White Horse: 25/100
White Horse is 2 points higher.
Crosswicks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
White Horse: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Crosswicks: 46/100 · White Horse: 15/100
Crosswicks is 31 points higher.
Crosswicks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
White Horse: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Crosswicks: 32/100 · White Horse: 20/100
Crosswicks is 12 points higher.
Crosswicks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
White Horse: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Crosswicks: Unavailable · White Horse: 91/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Crosswicks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
White Horse: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Crosswicks: 69/100 · White Horse: 20/100
Crosswicks is 49 points higher.
Crosswicks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
White Horse: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Crosswicks: 43/100 · White Horse: 41/100
Crosswicks is 2 points higher.
Crosswicks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
White Horse: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.